Pranamat versus Shakti mat

I received a Pranamat Eco as a lovely gift from Advaita. Since I have the Original Shakti mat™ I am writing a comparative review.

Pain relief through the use of such accupressure products is based on the controversial gate control theory of pain [Ronald Melzack & Patrick Wall, 1962], which hypothesizes that the perception of pain can be suppressed by inhibiting nociceptive transmission. The controversy surrounding the theory is that the clinical or curative efficacy of the treatment cannot be proven or disproven, beyond the placebo effect.

Nevertheless, I found that the accupressure mat is effective in providing therapeutic neck support, because the prickly thorns prevent neck movement.

Unboxing the Pranamat

The Pranamat is visually appealing in all aspects and finer detail of design and packaging. For example, the thorn design of the Pranamat appears sculptured in the form of a lotus.

Differences

The original Shakti mat™ consists of flexible memory foam core that contours to the back of the neck and supports the nape of the beck. The Advaita Pranamat, however, substitutes the mattress material with coconut fibres that provide firmer backing, but it is not easily adjustable for therapeutic neck support.

Advertisements

One comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s